Criminal Law
Abetment of suicide needs a proximate act, not just harassment
What the Court held
In Abhinav Mohan Delkar v. State of Maharashtra (Supreme Court of India, 18.08.2025; 2025 LiveLaw (SC) 812), the Court held that harassment alone, however prolonged or severe, cannot sustain a charge of abetment of suicide under Section 306 of the Indian Penal Code (now Section 108 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita) without a positive act, proximate in time to the suicide, and a conscious, deliberate intention to drive the person to take their life. It upheld the quashing of the case arising from the death of the late Member of Parliament Mohan Delkar.
Why it matters
The test, the Court reiterated, is whether the accused intended by their action to drive the victim to suicide, with a last proximate act that finally led to it; general or historical harassment, without that proximity and intention, does not meet the standard. The decision continues a careful line of authority that keeps Section 306 from being stretched to cover every allegation of ill-treatment that precedes a tragedy.
This note is general information on the law as at the date shown, not legal advice on any specific matter. The law changes; for advice on your facts, please speak to the firm.
Tell us about your matter.
Share the facts and we will tell you, candidly, where you stand and how we can help.